harry potter deathly hallows part 2 full film

Part 2 does have a fun opening action scene where the trio attempts to steal a horcrux from the goblin bank Gringotts, but it wasn't quite as thrilling as I expected. The movie isn't just an endless barrage of set pieces. By contrast, Part 2 is a lean and focused final sprint as the trio hunts down the final horcruxes, major characters complete their arcs, and we come to the deadly showdown between Harry and Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes).Īt two hours and ten minutes, Deathly Hallows – Part 2 is the shortest of all the Harry Potter flicks, but it feels as rich and full as the best films in the franchise. Whereas Deathly Hallows – Part 1 was a slow, deliberately-paced and character-driven narrative that saw Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), Ron (Rupert Grint), and Hermoine (Emma Watson) struggle with their friendship, their lack of direction, and the ongoing war between Voldemort's forces and the rest of the wizarding world.

It is the grandest of all of the Harry Potter films in scope, in action, and in heartbreak. By contrast, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 is an almost non-stop epic battle that still finds time for the character development and deeply moving moments the series became known for. The first part, while mostly centered on wandering and quiet moments, still managed to work in humor and thrilling set pieces.

Both parts of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows managed to avoid that problem. Financially, it was an unsurprising move, but if you have one movie that's all slow, methodical character development and the second movie that's all fast-paced action, then each movie could be monotonous because they've lost the other half of their story. Rowling's Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows was a risky proposition from a narrative standpoint.

Harry potter deathly hallows part 2 full film